View Single Post
Old 07-12-2014, 19:02   #4
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Coaliton's NewBuy housing scheme is a 95 per cent failure, official figures revea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry View Post
"The Chancellor said NewBuy would rebalance the property market, by stimulating prices outside London and the South East, and contribute to economic growth.He later launched Help to Buy, in which the government underwrites mortgages for first-time buyers on properties up to £600,000. Both schemes have been criticised for fuelling an already buoyant property market in the South East."[/I]
I really hope that isn't a direct quote. If the man thinks increasing property prices contribute to economic growth he's an idiot. They have a temporary feel good effect then it hits home to people they're mortgaged to the hilt, have less disposable income, and have been borrowing to maintain their lifestyle as their mortgage repayments are huge.

To rebalance the property market we need a ton more supply, especially in the South East, and for prices nationwide to return to something like sanity. We need prices in the South East to at most stabilise and ideally slowly fall, not for the rest of the country to catch up!

A healthy property market doesn't have a quarter of those in private rented accommodation claiming housing benefit, the rate of home ownership dropping in every demographic apart from retirees, and government actively putting taxpayers' money behind propping up house prices while actively dissuading local authorities from building affordable properties. Pretty much everywhere else you could mention investment in housing isn't considered as public debt. Here, of course, it conveniently is. Could be changed easily enough but might threaten the value of the investment property portfolios of the 1/3rd of MPs who are landlords.

Still if that is a direct quote or a summary it's good to know that the taxes of millions of priced out renters are going towards a policy intended to prop up and increase house prices.

Of course the alternative is Labour, the ******s who ensured a massive housing boom by ensuring housing costs weren't taken into account by the BoE for the purposes of interest rates. Inflated by Labour, prevented from fully deflating by Labour, coalition attempting to reinflate.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote