View Single Post
Old 29-11-2014, 00:31   #6
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Hindu sacrifice of 500,000 animals begins in Nepal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
Not aimed at you but it's equally impressive how readily some people will take up the cause of animal welfare when it relates to religious practise, whereas when such cruelty comes up in other contexts they are nowhere to be found.
Glad you said it wasn't directed at me. I'm vehemently opposed to non-stunned slaughter in general regardless of reason.

Both Jews and Muslims can rotate - if we're harvesting living creatures the least we can do is ensure they lose their perception rapidly and humanely rather than letting them bleed out.

Anyone else who desires non-stunned slaughter for dogmatic reasons whether it's cultural, spiritual, whatever, gets treated with equal disdain.

---------- Post added at 23:31 ---------- Previous post was at 23:29 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Apart from anything else, it is a complete waste of food.
It's frankly a disgrace to the human race. We claim to have come so far since we lived in caves then this kind of bloodthirsty barbarism is tolerated and it fires us right back there as a species.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote