Quote:
Originally Posted by jj20x
I have to agree. The press release makes it sound like some must have on demand service. All very well but, if it is such a valuable addition, why has it taken so long to add it?
|
Probably because it took VM a while to weigh up whether the programmes were worth it!
Not very impressed with our on demand selection really. Could do with more good quality stuff on there. Don't think we'll get it though.
They are missing a trick, because if cost is a problem, they could introduce the better programmes that are currently missing in a new premium pack. That means more money for VM.
---------- Post added at 12:58 ---------- Previous post was at 12:56 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
You have to think about the rights issues. They may have had a contract signed for channel carriage rights but not On demand. Its the same reason that some programmes never appear on catch up or some things don't play on +1 channels(such as movies)
Its very complicated now with so many ways to view content. All bases need covered.
|
True, although I do think I read somewhere that VM had decided not to add this because it was not of a good enough quality. I can't remember where I read it - don't think I dreamt it!