Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
Per my post the issue is providing a separate pool of bandwidth for the guest network that doesn't impinge on the subscriber. That's the complication. The solution is a second service flow.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Well no, it doesn't require a second service flow. Like I said, rate limiting the guest connection can easily be done on the CPE itself, had VM not removed the feature deliberately. The existing service flow already provides 15% more bandwidth than is required, adding or removing 2% from this is not complicated.
|
Indeed, why do you need a second service flow when you can just provision the existing service flow to have more bandwidth so the customer still gets their full connection? Why can't a customer on 152meg get provisioned for 180mbit and have the CPE limit to the 160ish that it is now, leaving a completely separate pool for the extra bandwidth?