Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Your point is? Zero is a lot less than 76 million.
---------- Post added at 18:56 ---------- Previous post was at 18:49 ----------
I don't play it for a number of reasons but that's not the point. The point was the Lottery could have been run as a non-profit operation ..
---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 18:56 ----------
Wow, do you always insult people when they have an opinion contrary to your own?
|
My point was that you were (seemingly) mixing percentages and whole numbers in a way that made the profit made by Camelot disproportionate - if you had used percentages or whole numbers, your post might not have been so loaded....
Or to put it another way -
Camelot made a profit of £76 million on an income of over £750 million, with £1,175 million going to good causes, and £3,524 million going to Lottery winners - not quite as emotive, is it?