View Single Post
Old 27-08-2014, 08:27   #15
BenMcr
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Services: 360 x2, Maxit TV, Sky Sports and Sky Cinema. Gig1
Posts: 17,929
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM FTTP trial Papworth Everard

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
I can't genuinely see any way a broadband connection and a phone line can cost less to provide than the same broadband connection on it's own. At the very least it requires additional powered equipment and more time for installation techs to actually install.
Most of the telco equipment is already there, and has been for years. If someone isn't connected to it, then it's sat there costing money to maintain without any return.

Even where a property hasn't had services before, I'd expect the cost of installing a master socket is pretty low in the grand scheme of network costs.

---------- Post added at 09:27 ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 ----------

Anyway, the standalone broadband costs on VM are cheaper than BB + Telco, just not the full difference, as the pricing will be done partly to encourage people to take more services.
BenMcr is offline   Reply With Quote