View Single Post
Old 08-08-2014, 13:11   #28
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Liberty Global Second Quarter Results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
Obvious way for Sky to drive take up is to invest in their own access network, which they are looking at through various trials, rather than using the same network as every other xDSL ISP. Comparing Sky's 38Mb for £20/month, requires phone line at £15.40/month, and 76Mb for £30/month, requires phone line at £15.40/month, with VM. It's not flattering - VM deliver 152Mb + phone line for less than Sky sell half that speed, and 100Mb for a quid a month more than Sky sell 38Mb.
Couldn't have put it any better , its far easier for a Sky telephone/BB customer to migrate their service away to the likes of BT , Plusnet , Talk Talk etc.

If Sky could start to build its own fibre network and become less reliant on Openreach I'm sure it would pay dividends long term.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote