Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimate.Conj
What have those with partial/very poor eyesight been doing up until now?
If VM are pushing their TV service to people to those who can't see very well and therefore not being able to get the full benefit, what is the world coming to?
I don't think the uptake of those with partial/very poor eyesight for subscription TV service would be too high. If I couldn't see very well, I know I wouldnt pay for a service I couldn't use.
|
Sight impaired people watch just as much television as non sight impaired people. Anything that can be done to help those less fortunate than ourselves can only be a good thing. Anybody can become disabled within the blink of an eyelid and most people will become disabled at some point in their life, so it really is to everybodys benefit to take time to think about how those with varying disabilities can be helped.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimate.Conj
As I understood, the optional £5 fee will give people the HD versions of the channels available on the M, M+ and L TV packages.
This wouldnt change your XL TV price, I wouldn't have thought, as like you say, we have all the HD channels anyway.
|
The details as you describe are correct and were discussed before LG bought VM. I haven't heard anything at all about this since the takeover though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by howardmicks
Sky witholding sky Atlantic ????? Is there any proof of this
|
Technically Sky aren't witholding SA, but have put such a high price on it that means that effectively they are pricing it out of the market for other broadcasters.
I posted the figures some time ago on here, don't have them to hand now but IIRC most channels receive pennies per week from the subscription fees, wheras SA worked out at well over £1 a week.