Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizon
[/COLOR]Of course having a choice to watch something is far better than not having a choice if the channels are not available. But this is a long running thing with VM and its predecessors...
VM don't seem to understand that having a logical order for channels, aides useabilty and makes the service easier to use. If they did, they might actually get a lot more tv customers, rather than it being flat growth for years and allowing a new competitor like BT to park their tanks on VM's (tv) lawn.
|
Really do not agree that channel order has any relevance to customer numbers.
BT have come into the market primarily to use sport to gain broadband customers and their chief target remains BSkyB. If not they would never have agreed to let their sport onto the XL pack....
---------- Post added at 16:11 ---------- Previous post was at 16:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by telegramsam
Right so now we have Sky Sports 3 & 4 in HD the moan now seems to be the channel numbers not being logical? Guys... DOES IT REALLY MATTER ONE IOTA?
Personally I wont be getting them in HD so long as the 7 quid charge remains but that`s just me.
|
To me Sam no it does not matter one iota.... :-)