Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
Yes it is. I replied to post #331, which suggested putting SS1HD on 511. I explained why that wouldn't work.
|
I'm not following you at all here. This is nothing to do with HD, but basic common sense. Do you really think that having Sky Sports News in front on the main sports channels will entice people to subscribe to sports, or entice people to pay an extra £7 for sports in HD? If people want sports and want it in HD, they'll pay for it regardless of the position of Sky Sports News.
---------- Post added at 15:47 ---------- Previous post was at 15:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug P
The channels are far more important than the numbering.
Surely?
Am celebrating VM today!
|
Of course having a choice to watch something is far better than not having a choice if the channels are not available. But this is a long running thing with VM and its predecessors...
VM don't seem to understand that having a logical order for channels, aides useabilty and makes the service easier to use. If they did, they might actually get a lot more tv customers, rather than it being flat growth for years and allowing a new competitor like BT to park their tanks on VM's (tv) lawn.