Thread: Microsoft Techs
View Single Post
Old 11-07-2014, 13:38   #7
rhyds
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Wales
Services: Plusnet Phone/BB, Freesat, VM Business BB (Cable)
Posts: 821
rhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond reputerhyds has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Microsoft Techs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit View Post
for the jobs he will be doing being a Microsoft certified engineer would be of little or no use to him. Being a Microsoft partner would give him access to recycled licences but any legitimate system will have its own anyway.

I have no paper qualification but am very good at hardware and software repairs
I have nothing against guys who fix PCs for a living, but claiming credentials that they don't hold is a step too far IMO.

He could always describe himself as a computer engineer, PC expert or even Windows expert, but "qualified microsoft technician" and "microsoft partner" implies MS sanctions what he does.

---------- Post added at 14:38 ---------- Previous post was at 14:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkC1984 View Post
If thinking about using his services then you would want to check his credentials. If just being nosy, then yes why interfere.
"Being nosy" depends on your point of view.

For example, I do a bit of IT repair work "on the side" for friends and family (my day job is also IT). Now I wouldn't really mind if someone else was to start a computer repair firm locally, as my livelihood doesn't depend on those little jobs.

However, if that firm was falsely advertising that they were Google/Cisco/PC World "partners" I would be concerned, as many people could be sucked in by such advertising. Also, if the owner's happy enough to mislead in advertising, would the temptation of misleading during fault diagnosis be resistible?
rhyds is offline   Reply With Quote