View Single Post
Old 02-07-2014, 17:30   #45
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Another gaming pc build thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M View Post
Really ?

Im pretty sure 91 is faster than 89
Apologies. I rather stupidly wrote them the wrong way around. See clarification above.

---------- Post added at 18:30 ---------- Previous post was at 18:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy-J View Post
You're right about that, qasdfdsaq must have typo'd?
Guilty. Trying to quote an example obviously doesn't help when I get it the wrong way round.

Nonetheless, seeing as he's still missed the point I stated earlier:

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
For example the GTX 780Ti is a very poor value for money card. Even the basic 780Ti [that means not overclocked] is, on average over £100 more than the GTX 780 6GB example I posted earlier [that means the Twin Frozr I specifically linked to], and is universally slower in every single test. You could brag about having the fastest "stock" card, but you could also get a card that's faster and better in every way, for £100 less.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote