View Single Post
Old 21-06-2014, 09:47   #21
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 48
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sky trialing 1Gb FTTP in Amazingstoke

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
Actually, for mobile masts, councils are not permitted to consider the "transmitting waves" at all in determining outcome or considering public objections. Hence, the most common reason they are declined or rejected is based on appearance. Not to say people don't complain but rather there is no legal basis to consider their complaint and (unless the council is breaking the law or being incompetent, which does sometimes happen) it will be rejected without even being considered.
Indeed. Rather pathetically a large part of the reason my mobile signal here is so poor is one serial objector.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote