View Single Post
Old 18-06-2014, 14:50   #32
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Huge network investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
VM only competes in half the country so I can see a need for it to invest in this respect.
Why?

I'm not sure what you're saying here. I understand a need to invest in new network, but I'm not sure about why upgrading the existing one massively would be needed?

Do you think that offering 3 times the speed BT do would somehow win more customers than offering twice the speed? I'm not sure there would be many people who are on 76Mb now and would jump to 250Mb but turn their noses up at 152Mb.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote