Quote:
Originally Posted by idi banashapan
I think you are correct for the main part (it's at the bottom of the ocean). How it came to be there I don't know - neither do any of us here.
That said, my opinion does not mean fact or that other theories are not possible and I'm very open to be proven otherwise. as Tizmeinit says, unless you were actually there, you simply won't know.
however, I don't think that ideas that try to explain away what may have happened should all be classed as 'stupid' or irrelevant or just be dismissed outright, just because they don't fit what most people deem as the most 'likely' of causes or results. 'most likely' does not equal 'actually happened'.
i believe it would be closed minded to think anyone here 'knows' what happened. at present, every opinion that anyone here presents is purely speculative and is therefore no less a theory than the next person's opinion
|
No because there is more evidence for one theory than another. Not every theory is equally valid. Some people think it was hijacked by Aliens. We don't have to entertain every theory someone has just because we don't have definitive evidence as to which theory is true. We'll likely never have all the facts since we weren't there so we need to ascertain what happened via the evidence presented to us.
With the 'everyone's opinion is equal' route then even if they find the plane in the South Indian Ocean the conspiracy people will tell us it was planted there by the Government who hijacked it and we'll have to treat that as equally plausible too.
At the moment the best evidence we have points towards the ditching in the Indian Ocean. Maybe someone hijacked it, flew over Indian airspace without the Indians noticing, and landed on a airstrip big enough but remote enough to land a 777 and then hide it but there is no evidence that happened.