Thread: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016
View Single Post
Old 15-05-2014, 19:36   #25
Sirius
Grumpy Fecker
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 17,036
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016
We were chatting about this in the office today and the consensus was good idea, but will never happen. Its been talked about before and it failed before.
__________________
The UK is now the regime of Kim Jong Starmer the UK's dictator
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote