View Single Post
Old 15-05-2014, 17:09   #16
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
That's not a response to anything I posted ???

---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:34 ----------



Yes, also known has having Code powers
Actually there are licences with and without code powers - those two include code powers though there are plenty of licenced operators that don't have code powers.

What you posted wasn't worth replying to for the most part. I'm sure LGI will come up with plenty of reasons why they shouldn't allow access to their ducts and time and judges / regulators will tell whether these arguments hold water. The comment about duct repairs was an example.

---------- Post added at 16:09 ---------- Previous post was at 16:08 ----------

In other news I would hope those who aren't LGI employees / shareholders see the benefits in this. If it goes well it will mean better services whether people are LGI customers or not as they'll start to see increased competition; this is something BT aren't going to provide at the tech level, and will force LGI to raise their game accordingly.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote