View Single Post
Old 15-05-2014, 15:35   #12
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana View Post
Garbage, they cannot be told to do anything, it is their network that they paid for. It's basically like you building your own house and then being told to house people. Vms lawyers will have a field dayi
VM can be told exactly what to do as far as opening up their network assets passively go and there is precisely nothing they can do about it if they want to continue business in the UK.

---------- Post added at 14:35 ---------- Previous post was at 14:29 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
<Snip>
If LGI would rather spend money on lawyers arguing with the government / EC on this matter that's entirely their prerogative. Given it applies Europe-wide I fully imagine they will.

If they lose I would also imagine their UK subsidiary will comply with it as every other subsidiary in Europe will.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote