Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
Show me where VM have been obligated to offer passive access to their duct infrastructure before, please? This has only been applied to Openreach in the UK?
|
that statement was in regards to coordination of civils works. This is aready in place in the UK and has been since the introduction of the New Roads and Street Works Act, and further with The Traffic Management Act.
Quote:
|
I would imagine that if VM start extracting the urine and making excuses to avoid giving others access to their network there would be remedies available. It is taken as read that VM have full ducts like everyone else so will have quite legitimate reasons for refusing access to some of their plant.
|
yes, and network security etc,etc
[quote]If a duct collapses and needs replacing the altnet will know about it and when the duct is replaced VM can be required to allow altnets access to deploy.[quote] deploy what? A few metres of useless duct, not connected to anything
Quote:
|
The operator's fibre would be in a subduct / microduct inside VM's duct so zero interference.
|
risk to VMs cables when installing sub-duct?????