Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan
In fairness, I agree with him. I stand by the controversial opinion of - you're paying for the service VM is meant to provide. If VM is unable to provide that service, they shouldn't be selling it.
|
This is an argument that cuts either way, IMO.
First, I agree with Igni that VM should police their network to give everyone a fair chance.
On the other hand, all the mega-downloaders on a segment doing that at the same time sort of police themselves because they are competing with each other for resource. Then they whinge without having read the cautions that VM publish.
In particular peops have purchased an "up to" service and they know what that means. So, Kush, I think you are wrong.