Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
I know and my answer is 'tough' as I stated above! He's not in an anti terrorist role now, has been appointed and by all accounts he's very good at his job.
|
I know. I am answering why they feel concerned. They feel there is an inference
to appointing a anti-terror investigator. Unintentional or not.
Quote:
|
If the 'community' don't like it well hard luck but I'm still waiting for someone to tell me who this 'community' is, where they've made their feelings on this topic known en masse and why they should have the right to dictate who the govt. does or doesn't appoint.
|
Well I don't think they're suggesting they have a right to make the decision, they do have a right to question it and that's what they're doing.
Quote:
|
I reckon it's the usual PC brigade and self appointed 'community leaders' who're whining and maybe if they'd done their jobs better this enquiry wouldn't have been needed.
|
Well it's the chief constable of the police force. Also we don't know if they've done their jobs correctly or not as the investigation into the allegations are still ongoing. Maybe this is why he is expressing concerns as well? After all the calvary is being sent in while the police and the council are still working on verifying the inital claims and the unsigned plan. It appears the investigation has taking on a high degree of speed to the extent that it's skipped the part where we find out if anything needs further investigation.
Moving on my one personal feeling is that the letter seems rather dubious but the amount of claims in it's aftermath lend credibility to the idea that something unacceptable is happening. However we do not know this for sure and, if it is true, we do not know if it's part of a coordinated plan, a single incident, or a series of incidents.
---------- Post added at 20:46 ---------- Previous post was at 20:44 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Since when do we have to confirm with a community under investigation if they are happy with the investigator. Next they will want someone from the group under investigation to do the investigation  |
You don't but you're free to express your displeasure with an investigation or a public appointment to the degree to which you're permitted to by law.