I see there's 'outrage' about the appointment of Peter Clarke to investigate this matter. Apparently some folks are objecting to his previous association with terrorism investigations and reckon the 'community' will get the wrong message. Tough I reckon. Who are these people who speak for 'the community'? Even the Chief Constable is concerned about the appointment fearing it will offend 'the community' and result in 'unwarranted conclusions'. If he's got the right skills to do the job who the hell are they to object on the basis of a previous post?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ngham-27031941