View Single Post
Old 23-03-2014, 17:09   #33
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Scientists find 'marker' left by Big Bang

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkle View Post
I can't say I'm a believer in cold fusion, I can't be as I haven't examined this machine myself. But I'm still cautiously sitting on the bench. Though, I haven't seen anything that disproves it either.
Agreed, though as per the onus is on the people making the claims to produce the evidence for them. Evidence for hot fusion is well documented.

The sloppy nature of the 'evidence' provided alongside the lack of independence evident from a number of those involved in the single published 'third party' paper doesn't bode well.

I would be ecstatic if it were the case, it'd be an incredibly good thing for the world, however given the controversy could be over in a heartbeat but Rossi seems to have ensured that no equivocal testing has been done it has to be viewed with skepticism at a bare minimum.

The simplest of tricks could have been performed to achieve his results in at least some cases - wiring the power input so that 3kW is being drawn from an unmeasured earth wire while measuring neutral and live.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote