View Single Post
Old 31-01-2014, 14:27   #19
Joedm45
cf.geek
 
Joedm45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Beyond The Sun
Posts: 714
Joedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of QuadsJoedm45 has a fine set of Quads
Re: UHD tv and poor picture

Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat View Post
The cynic would say that 3D failed to drive new sales of TVs that the industry was hoping for, so now they are pushing 4K.

4K will be great when there is plenty of content and a TV of 60" plus is appropriate for the room in which you want to view it.

Also, the quality of the TVs upscaler will be important, which means 4K TVs that produce a decent picture from SD (and HD?) will be expensive.

Personally, I think 4K TV is a niche product at the moment for people with loads of spare money and big living rooms. And even then, they could have problems with current content.

Just my POV.
Sounds like a very good summary to me. Like with all new technology it will eventually become more affordable.

I strongly agree with your point about screen size compared to room size. I hear so many people saying how big their TV's are and then you find out the room is 10 x 10 foot or something ridiculous and I just think why?

Perhaps size matters to some people???
Joedm45 is offline   Reply With Quote