Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
So basically you are saying that Sky don't use insidious and underhand tactics when all the evidence of the last 10 years would suggest otherwise but alas as always the mere suggestion when someone mentions it gets the usual quick denials and lack of acceptance of the real truth of how Sky abuse their monopolistic position.
|
Here we go again. What evidence? What real truth? What monopoly? What are Sky doing that isn't done by any successful company in any sector in any UK market?
Your position is fascinating. Do you, or did you ever, work for a company? Didn't it ever seek to differentiate itself from its competitors to obtain commercial advantage? It's absolutely normal, not insidious or underhand, absolutely normal.