Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
So what can the family do now?
|
Judicial Review maybe?
---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
If you live by the sword, you will die by the sword. Ancient wisdom that still has resonance today. Duggan may not have been in possession of a gun at the fatal moment, but he put himself at risk of exactly this end by way he conducted his life.
I hope the liberal hand-wringers and professional agitators will drop it now this verdict is in - a verdict by a jury, let us not forget, not a coroner deciding alone.
But I doubt it.
|
Although the main reason it won't drop is because this is the worst possible verdict for drawing a line under the case. They found he didn't aim a gun or have it on him at the time police confronted him but did agree he had a gun and the police believed him to still be in possession of that gun. Everyone is going to believe they're right here. The 'hand-wringers' will point to his lack of possession of the weapon at the time of the shooting whilst others will point to the police believing he had a gun on him at the time and the fact he had a gun in the first place.