Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
How the hell is an isa an aggressive tax avoidance scheme, you play straight into their hands you really do, time and again courts decree specific aggressive tax avoidance schemes illegal and people like yourself still call out 'what their doing isn't illegal it's avoidance'
|
An ISA is not an 'aggressive tax avoidance scheme'. And 'aggressive tax avoidance scheme' is not a phrase used in the graphic posted above.
The word used in the graphic is 'avoidance'. 'Avoidance' is a very broad spectrum which, at one end, has common practice such as ISA use.
So, I pose the questions again: do you think the person that compiled the graphic has been in any way discerning about what figures to include? Are all avoidance measures included? If not, where was the line drawn? What criteria did the person compiling the graphic use to determine which (legal) tax avoidance measures to include alongside (illegal) tax evasion and which to leave out?