View Single Post
Old 03-12-2013, 09:27   #8
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: TFL looking into allowing sponsored Tube Names

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
I don't know if it is true, but I was told that when my Uni moved, we could have had our name added to the local DLR station name (after a for clause so it would be "xxxx for yyyy' rather than just "xxxx"), and the Uni refused when TFL said it would cost £10 million for the naming rights.
Yes that's the sort of thing I think is being considered here. Let's face it, nobody in their right mind is going to allow iconic stations like Tower Bridge, for example, to be renamed Dr Pepper are they...

The common station name doesn't need to be altered at all - all that's required is for the sponsor's ID to be associated with that station in some way, perhaps excluding all other advertising so that the station would itself be themed according to the sponsor's requirements and the amount they're prepared to pay. Unlike most ugly external signage adorning our buildings, most of the material would be invisible to those above ground and therefore not a blot on the landscape at all.
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote