Quote:
Originally Posted by harry_hitch
And yet you continually stated your own info was true and based on solid foundations. People constantly challenged you because you appeared to be perpetuating a rumour/speculating, based on insider info from other posters and a couple of media reports.
It now turns out you had no solid info and just spread another rumour based on insider info. The insider may well think they were told correct info, and passed said info on in good faith, but it was still a rumour to start off with.
Ironic really.
FYI, I have no problem with anyone posting info from insiders they may or may not know. I am happy to read the info. Whether I believe it or not is another matter
|
Harry, I think that basing posts on media reports is far better than posting garbage from 'Virgin Media insiders', most of whom are either fictional or planting false stories. Why do you believe that someone taking a view on media reports is perpetuating rumours?? A media report of this nature is not a rumour.
---------- Post added at 19:34 ---------- Previous post was at 19:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry_hitch
Clearly you decided not to highlight the part where I said "I believe company statements"
If a company makes a statement about something that has actually launched, what makes you think they/anyone are predicting anything?
|
Harry, I really think you've lost your sense of humour. Read your post and my reply again. Maybe you'll see the funny side next time around.
