Both companies have said that they have charged in line with their genuine interpretation of the contracts
.
So are we expected to believe that billing for tagging dead people or people not even on a tagging order is a legitimate interpretation of the contracts
and how do you interpret a contract beyond it's designed purpose
---------- Post added at 11:52 ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
It looks like a problem with their procedures when there is a change of circumstances. Is it delays in passing the info that a tag has been removed to other departments. The Ministry of Justice aren't exactly hot on passing on info quickly.
|
What about the dead ones or those not even placed on a tagging order by the courts ,how can that be a procedural error ?