Thread: General Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 5.
View Single Post
Old 11-11-2013, 13:38   #2863
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,311
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 5.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry_hitch View Post
I am not a fan of it either, but if Sky/VM/BT pump money into channels, why should they not reap the benefits from it?

We all pay our money and make our choices. If people are unhappy, that is their right, but people can make a different choice. They change something, or put up with their choice. Why moan about it on here, what good does it do? Such points would put to far better use in an e-mail to Sky/VM/BT.[COLOR="Silver"]
What I am saying is that the practice should be made unlawful. This would bring about two benefits for the customer. First of all, prices would come down, and secondly, everyone would be able to gain access from any platform.

I don't think we should condone the status quo. It means that to get all the access you want to programmes, you have to subscribe both to VM and Sky. How can that be right?
OLD BOY is offline