View Single Post
Old 11-11-2013, 10:04   #14
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,119
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: The shame of the government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J View Post
Eventually there may not be 'family' to take care of their son..especially as parents get older and more infirm.Then the state will be paying out far more than £71.

---------- Post added at 09:52 ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 ----------

Also I'm a taxpayer as well and I've no problem with this poor boy getting financial assistance.
And where does it say he was turned down? They simply wanted more that a simple letter from the GP. The parents were just too stubborn to do that. No decision one way or another had yet been taken

If being at school was serving a purpose other than being a babysitter, doesn't that possibly suggest that he is capable of more than the parents are implying?
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote