View Single Post
Old 09-11-2013, 15:59   #56
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Can someone explain why cable suffers on upload?

Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast View Post
Yes, but I didn't get a definitive answer. What would be most expensive and which would offer most future proofing? Extra coax or fibre?
Fibre would be more expensive
Fibre would offer more future proofing

Fibre offers virtually unlimited capacity but using it all gets exceedingly expensive - to the point it's much much cheaper to run multiple fibres than to shove more carriers onto one fibre once you go above a certain amount. It also requires more expensive active equipment.

The main advantage of coax is it's easy to manipulate - extending, shortening, splitting, etc. can all be done with a couple of $15 hand tools. Splicing fibre is something you need a dedicated technician to do with a few hundred $'s worth of equipment.


Quote:
I wonder how many areas already have fibre from node to cab then and how many of those have individualised coax from cab to premises?
None?
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote