View Single Post
Old 05-11-2013, 23:16   #997
adzii_nufc
Rafalution
 
adzii_nufc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 35
Posts: 5,338
adzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appeal
adzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appeal
Re: The Xbox One Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
tbh it's the first wave of next gen games. Give it a year or two for devs to really get to grips with the hardware. Same happened with current gen. Look back at graphics on launch games compared to now.

If you go to the official Titanfall site you can download a 1080p @ 30fps video of multiplayer. It looks spectacular, video is over 900mb for only a few minutes of gameplay though. Very high bit rate.


There is a lot more to the COD games each year. More so when it used to alternate between the two dev teams.
Like what? A dog or some moving fish? It's MW3 reskinned and with a name change. They aren't fooling anyone when we all know it's just another Modern Warfare game. The MW series died with Infinity Ward. I think 3ARC produce better COD games than the fake Infinity Ward which I think you've mentioned in that last bit. Honestly it has to be 3ARC taking over full time or remaking COD 4 because the reviews activision haven't bought currently have this at 5/10. Hopefully the nail in the coffin.

Modern Warfare 1-2, Sensational. (Infinity Ward)
Modern Warfare 3-4, Awful. (Fake Infinity Ward)
Black Ops 1-2 Brilliant. (Treyarch)
I think the cause is quite clear.

You're right though there is more to COD games but I think it's every 2 years because It's Treyarch that bring the changes.
__________________
All posts are the opinion of myself and don't reflect those of BT or Openreach.
adzii_nufc is offline   Reply With Quote