Thread: General STM always enforced?
View Single Post
Old 27-10-2013, 22:49   #288
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: STM always enforced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Only 3 - if you are that keen to block P2P surely you could do much better than that a quick google should bring up thousands.
tbh he seems to be a fan of reporting everybody just about everyday for everything.

Not sure what crime he's imagining this time (apparently Kushan having below "adverage" intelligence was worthy of a police report last week)...

---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 22:44 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
In the sort of areas where VM are competing with FTTC I suspect that the distance from subscriber to cab isn't going to be all that great. For instance I'm ~ 300m from my FTTC cabinet and have a 60Mbps estimate. I'm actually nearer than that to the next cabinet along though. I have seen mention of someone being about a mile (iirc) from their cab but I'd lay odds that there is no cable service there.
According to Thinkbroadband the average line length across the UK is around 480m from cabinet, with 60% of lines being 500m or less.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote