Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
... which means that the Intel Puma5 is a minor evolution of the VMNG300 Puma 5.
|
Different substrate possibly and fabricator but a TNETC4800/10/30 from Intel wet line must be same circuit design as TI TNETC4800/10/30?
Unfortunately as stated by others there's no parametric comparisons available in public domain for legacy Texas and current Intel manufacturers!
However the fact that Texas originally additionally produced TNETC4820/40(not currently listed in Intel P5 family) with some optimised Data Modem features begs the question as to what exact (TI)chipset variant was included in VMNG300 as opposed to latter (Intel)SH2?
Even considering VM/Netgear may have included the eMTA chipset but left the I/O redundant in VM's 2nd order product may explain some of the "dumbed" down feature code in firmware/eCOS?