Thread: General STM always enforced?
View Single Post
Old 17-10-2013, 21:30   #193
Kushan
FORMER Virgin Media Staff
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,737
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Re: STM always enforced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
The Snapdragon 800 is actually a LTE-Advanced ("true 4G") chipset and an upgraded version of the Galaxy S4 with it already exists. Originally released as Korea-only a leaked UK EE firmware for an international model has surfaced, suggesting it will be coming over here too.
I thought you said that only Cat6-8 were LTE-A? The Snapdragon 800 is only CAT-4, so is there more to it than that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
The S4 LTE (GT-i9505) is category 3, yes. And yes, it can readily do those speeds - both of which are faster than BT FTTC and the upload alone is ten times faster than what VM can give me even without STM
This is true, but how much bandwidth is there to go around, really? DC-HSDPA+ is meant to be 42Mbit but I rarely ever see it break double digits. Not only are you dealing with the perils of a wireless technology, you're also competing with sometimes hundreds of other people. I would like to know how much capacity the various spectrum blocks can truly have.
Kushan is offline   Reply With Quote