Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
i did apply to be on the trial when news first broke and I am flipping glad I wasn't accepted now. It would do my nut in if I reported genuine visible problems on a "trial forum" and they did sweet fa to fix it. If you was the dude in charge of the shub2 rollout I would be sitting down with everyone and saying "right guys, I don't want us to make the same mistakes as we did with shub1 so I want a list of all the bugs people are reporting with shub2 and we aren't going to release it to the general customer base until we have got them all fixed and a new firmware update tested and released".
How hard can it be?  |
There was discussion on that too. We said at the time that they would come in for stick with R19. Their focus for R26 (which went public 1 month after the triallists got it) was to deal with the latency variations and 12 hour T4s.
For my part, my SH2 was wholly stable within less than one month of trial commencement (I was in router mode). To debug the T4 events, I was one of the users who received a Netgear specialist at home. But it wasn't stable for all triallists; those on Motorola BSRs had instability until the pre-release candidate for R26 (R23).
Decent wireless as compared with SH1 was a feature right from the start of the trial.
So there's a potted history.