Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
I know, but I don't have to , as I'm not the one suggesting that the McCanns had anything to do with the girls abduction.
I wasn't aware that innocence had to proven, but was presumed until compelling evidence was produced until they are tried and convicted
---------- Post added at 06:48 ---------- Previous post was at 06:37 ----------
Of course it's evidence. But you answered your own question. On there own they are unreliable. Simple as that.
You have no idea what questions are being asked, or what the investigating teams are currently doing.
|
neither does the opposition all we are doing is voicing our suspicions nothing more. I am not saying they did anything I am saying I think they might have and seeing as I not saying they are guilty I do not have to prove anything either
Of course if there ever is enough evidence to charge them then they will have to prove their innocence just as the prosecution would have to prove their guilt