Originally Posted by Pierre

If there is enough compelling evidence you don't need a body.

There have be several convictions that I know of, one i recall quite recently, where a body was not available.

I don't know all the evidence in the case. But I would expect after all this time that there was a lot of crime science evidence along with a whole host more. They have tracked the McCanns movements for the weeks prior, they would have known exactly what they were doing and when they did it.

I just dislike the armchair and internet judge and juries that are no more informed than the guy in the pub.

---------- Post added at 23:14 ---------- Previous post was at 23:14 ----------



What's your point?