View Single Post
Old 12-10-2013, 15:42   #753
andy_m
cf.mega poster
 
andy_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North-West Kent
Services: VIP
Posts: 2,887
andy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze array
andy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze array
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 5.

It might only be 5% who actually watch the channel, but it's a hell of a lot more who actually cite the channel as a reason for choosing Sky. Whether they end up watching it is pretty immaterial. Sky think it drives a quarter of their subs.

---------- Post added at 14:42 ---------- Previous post was at 14:40 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42 View Post
if sky was bothered about ad revenue they would let others have the channels long time ago there not and if sky was bothered and the crap SA viewing figures it would been on others long time ago too they not they think people chose sky because of SA even though viewing figures contradict that they want people to get sky pay for the boxes and pay the HD charge they don't want to lose customers which they will lose lots if they give VM the withheld channels
I posted before I read this post, but, basically, this ^^
__________________
Who gives a @*#$ about an Oxford comma?
andy_m is offline