View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 23:59   #23
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Looks like Virgin are determined to flush out old modems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
There are two opinions on this and both are equally valid:

Opinion 1) The superhubs can handle 8 D/S channels and thus load balance more effectively than the Ambit 300 (your modem). However, in less congested areas the difference will be minimal. So in that respect, upgrading to a superhub (1 or 2) may help you in certain instances
The Superhub doesn't do any load balancing, it's the CMTS' job to do load balancing. A Superhub may make the job a tiny amount easier on a badly run network, but depending on that is just a lousy excuse for a badly run network, not a benefit of the Superhub.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote