Thread: General STM always enforced?
View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 13:04   #116
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: STM always enforced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by horseman View Post
Moving DPI from edge routers inwards seems to imply some areas have now core routing capacity issues caused by on-net P2P and not just off-net?
Interesting, although not entirely unpredictable development!
That would seem quite contrary to previous claims that VM's core capacity is superb and "there is no congestion on the core network".
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote