Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit
what about it?
What about the growing cost as more and more people live longer and longer. As I said it is an inconvenient truth but it is still the truth.
|
So let me get this straight, are you saying you want those who have worked for most of there lives and put money in to be penalised and have there pension stopped or reduced whilst at the same time protecting or increasing the benefits given to those who have
NEVER put any money in because they are lazy *******s that have never worked and refuse to work.
---------- Post added at 17:04 ---------- Previous post was at 17:01 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit
no no no the state pension costs 74 billion a year
Means test it
|
Why. If i have paid in all my life because i am not a lazy ******* that has no intention of working and has never worked why should my pension be reduced to fund the lazy *******s. I tell you what as of now i agree that anyone that can work but will not work should have every penny of there benefits stopped, i bet they get a job pretty quickly then.
It ****es me off when those who have never worked and
will not work because they are lazy ***** still get given benefits. Meanwhile those who work fund the lazy ***** that
will not work.
These days i suffer from bad arthritis and the Doctor said i have a case to reduce my hours or not work at all. However the tramadol i get reduces the pain so i can still work
WHY because i want to work.