Thread: General Prices
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2013, 12:30   #26
kwikbreaks
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC, FoxSat HDR for TV, Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
Re: Prices

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
And if the ISP is perfectly able and prepared to provide that level of service, why should they be banned from doing so?
If they can then fine but I doubt that there are many that can support downloads and uploads at full headline speed by all their customers 24x7 which is what "unlimited" implies.

Every utility that supplies a measurable product (such as gas electricity and water) does so at standing charge + price per unit volume. If ISPs did the same it would get rid of the "unlimited" nonsense and all the sniping between high volume users and low.

---------- Post added at 11:30 ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by everyday View Post
according to Google VM have already been investigated by the ASA about this unlimited thing and cleared.
They had to drop their letters threatening disconnection for excessive use to do so. Now they just send advisory letters which get filed in the bin. There are still plenty of complaints about congestion proving that their capacity isn't unlimited. The ASA also made questionable rulings about what can be called fibre optic broadband. IMO neither cable nor FTTC legitimately meet that description but both can be sold as such.
kwikbreaks is offline   Reply With Quote