Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit
There are a lot of things the special forces and secret services do that we never get to know about. Just because our government is inept does not mean they are. Just saying
|
The type of operation proposed for Diana's death would be fine for an African dictator or Eastern European criminal where if it doesn't work or evidence is left the government can shrug its shoulders and say "The security services do not kill people"
If the state were involved in the death of the mother of a future king can you imagine the storm that would occur if their involvement came to light?
They would need to have people in place to ensure there was no CCTV or photographs (of the most photographed woman on the planet), they would need people in place in the first responders or hospital to kill her in case the initial crash didn't do the job, they would need to ensure her bodyguard was killed as well to stop him talking, they would need to have access to the drivers body to tamper with the bloodwork in such a way that's undetectable and then keep the whole lot undercover for ever whilst manipulating official inquests in several different countries to keep them to the official story.
Then any records would need to be redacted forevermore just in case the ex parents-in-law of a soldier decide to spill the beans
Or it could have been a drunk driver crashing his car at speed during a tricky part of the road.