Quote:
Originally Posted by howardmicks
Ment nothing nasty by my comment bud,don't know how Colin got on but bt seemed to have problem broadcasting there own channel during the Liverpool game some only got the first half and other missed the last 20 mins and by the sounds of it some never saw it at all.was it okay for you Colin ?
|
Your comment was valid either way mate, I have no worries with what you said. I call a spade a spade and I expect (and prefer) others to do the same
I did not see much of the game as I was at the gym for most of the game, but the 10-15 minutes or so I did see, the picture quality was excellent and there was no breaking up.
It seems odd that BT could not provide a picture to their own subscribers, but VM could provide seemingly excellent coverage. Is there a known reason for this?
---------- Post added at 00:09 ---------- Previous post was at 00:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
Hey, if people give it, they should be able to take it.
VM have done really well getting BT sport in XL, and I say that as someone who won't even watch it. When the other rumoured channels arrive, VM will surely be 'the provider' to have. This is cause for celebration among VM users, but may upset a few users of other providers.
|
BIB. True, but at least one person needs to know when to stop.
If the possible other channels arrive, it will be fantastic for VM. As I said last night, I will be fascinated to see how Sky will counter VM's
possible line up after Sept. 14th