View Single Post
Old 14-08-2013, 19:48   #3352
andy_m
cf.mega poster
 
andy_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North-West Kent
Services: VIP
Posts: 2,887
andy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze array
andy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze arrayandy_m has a bronze array
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu View Post
I can answer that question in 2.

I have no complaints about Sky, IF, BT Sports is not on VM i will put BT Sports on the Freesat channel (yes l know l said l would get it on Sky, but paying £12 is cheaper than paying 30 to go to WHL).

In all the time l was with Sky, l complained only TWICE in ten years, l had a dish problem.

With VM l was complaining about loss of picture,sound etc, and poor boxes, and that was within a couple of months.

Sky wins hands down in my opion.
It's not about price, it's about value. About £45 a month will get you a Sky and BT Sport subscription in HD. Great. But the same money buys you a couple of pints in the Bill Nic and a seat behind the goal in the South upper. Cancel your sport subs and go to one game a month with the money you save! Go on, you know it makes sense!
__________________
Who gives a @*#$ about an Oxford comma?
andy_m is offline   Reply With Quote