Thread: Superhub Superhub 2
View Single Post
Old 05-08-2013, 15:58   #990
Kushan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,737
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Re: superhub 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
You'll get a debate going now as to who's an expert!

But first, "experts" would need to understand the question!!!

---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 ----------



Kush - his argument is simple though put in terser language by him.

I'll put a bit of wrap on. Bringing out a SH2 to cure the wireless issues of the SH1, only deals with range - not later functions like ac. Furthermore, putting the Puma5 chip into the SH2 doesn't make the VMNG300 future proof; conversely the use of Puma5 in the VMNG300 certainly renders the SH2 non-future proof.

For the above reasons, his point about older and newer equipment delivering the top VM speeds and capable of going higher exactly makes his point about the SH2 not being any more future proof than its predecessors.
I guess I just fail to see how the Superhub (or SH2) could be any more future proof than they already are. 8 DS channels seems more than adequate for what future plans are (200Mbit?) before they start rolling out 3.1 hardware. Could always have more DS channels I suppose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
I know what they told me. Our V23 had problems that they wouldn't want to see released but they wouldn't elaborate - as they won't.

But I do understand what it was. The SH2 behaved very well and was highly stable in router mode for customers (such as I) attached to a Cisco CMTS. But customers on the trial attached to the Motorola CMTS were having problems akin to those experienced by the same people in the VMNG300 days. (The problem was known as the TEK event problem which caused the modem to reset).

V26 is supposed to cure this and by all accounts that I can see on the trials forum it has.

I suspect that VM had to release the flaky V19 because they were running out of SH1s (I don't know that officially) and peops were generally nervous that would receive the discredited SH1. Sort of thing.

Anyway the V26 SH2 is a credible get-you-going device in router mode. I still hold to the modem mode mantra, of course.
If I had to guess, I'd suggest that someone somewhere decided that the SH2 was to be launched on a certain day and that's why they've pushed it out with the most stable firmware to date.
Kushan is offline   Reply With Quote