Quote:
Originally Posted by raging bull
Do the experts agree that if SH2 marketed as strongly as the offering from BT, would Virgin be allowed to shout about how good the SH2 was!
|
You'll get a debate going now as to who's an expert!
But first, "experts" would need to understand the question!!!
---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan
I'm not really sure what his argument is, other than both older and newer equipment is still on the network - which has never been any different.
|
Kush - his argument is simple though put in terser language by him.
I'll put a bit of wrap on. Bringing out a SH2 to cure the wireless issues of the SH1, only deals with range - not later functions like ac. Furthermore, putting the Puma5 chip into the SH2 doesn't make the VMNG300 future proof; conversely the use of Puma5 in the VMNG300 certainly renders the SH2 non-future proof.
For the above reasons, his point about older and newer equipment delivering the top VM speeds and capable of going higher exactly makes his point about the SH2 not being any more future proof than its predecessors.